|
Albert, D., Kreutzer, M., Lechner, C. 2015. Resolving the paradox of interdependency and strategic renewal in activity systems. Academy of Management Review, 40: 210–234. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Balakrishnan, S. 1988. The prognostics of diversifying acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 185–196. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Barnard, C. I. 1938. The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
|
|
Barney, J. B. 1988. Returns to bidding firms in mergers and acquisitions: Reconsidering the relatedness hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 71–78. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
|
|
Barney, J. B. 2018. Why resource-based theory’s model of profit appropriation must incorporate a stakeholder perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 39: 3305–3325. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Baucus, M. S. 1995. Halo-adjusted residuals: Prolonging the life of a terminally ill measure of corporate social performance. Business & Society, 34: 227–235. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
|
|
Berle, A. A. 1931. Corporate powers as powers in trust. Harvard Law Review, 44: 1049–1074. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Berle, A. A. 1954. The 20th century capitalist revolution. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace. Google Scholar
|
|
Berle, A. A. 1959. Foreword. In Mason, E. S. (Ed.), The corporation in modern society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
|
|
Brauer, M., Zimmermann, M. 2019. Investor response to workforce downsizing: The influence of industry waves, macroeconomic outlook, and firm performance. Journal of Management, 45: 1775–1801. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
|
|
Brink, A. 2010. Enlightened corporate governance: Specific investments by employees as legitimation for residual claims. Journal of Business Ethics, 93: 641–651. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Brown, S. J., Warner, J. B. 1980. Measuring security price performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 8: 205–258. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
|
|
Brown, S. J., Warner, J. B. 1985. Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14: 3–31. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
|
|
Business Roundtable . 1997. Statement on corporate governance. Retrieved from http://www.ralphgomory.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Business-Roundtable-1997.pdf Google Scholar
|
|
Business Roundtable . 2019a. Redefined purpose of a corporation: Welcoming the debate. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@BizRoundtable/redefined-purpose-of-a-corporation-welcoming-the-debate-8f03176f7ad8 Google Scholar
|
|
Business Roundtable . 2019b. Statement on the purpose of the corporation. Retrieved from https://opportunity.businessroundtable.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Business-Roundtable-Statement-on-the-Purpose-of-a-Corporation-with-Signatures.pdf Google Scholar
|
|
Chakravarthy, B. S. 1986. Measuring strategic performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7: 437–458. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
|
|
Choi, J., Wang, H. 2009. Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 895–907. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
|
|
Dodd, E. M. 1932. For whom are managers trustees? Harvard Law Review, 45: 1145–1163. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Donaldson, T., Preston, L. E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20: 65–91. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
|
|
Elms, H., Johnson-Cramer, M. E., Berman, S. L. 2011. Bounding the world’s miseries: Corporate responsibility and Freeman’s stakeholder theory. In Phillips, R. A. (Ed.), Stakeholder theory: Impact and prospects: 1–53. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Fink, L. 2018. Purpose and profit. Retrieved from https://www.blackrock.com/corporate/investor-relations/larry-fink-ceo-letter Google Scholar
|
|
Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman. Google Scholar
|
|
Freeman, R. E. 2017. Five challenges to stakeholder theory: A report on research in progress. In Wasieleski, D. M., Weber, J. (Eds.), Stakeholder management: 1–20. Bingley, UK: Emerald. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C. 2007. Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
|
|
Freeman, R. E., Phillips, R., Sisodia, R. 2018. Tensions in stakeholder theory. Business & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0007650318773750 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
|
|
Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13. Google Scholar
|
|
Fryxell, G. E., Wang, J. 1994. The Fortune corporate reputation index: Reputation for what? Journal of Management, 20: 1–14. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
|
|
Garcia-Castro, R., Aguilera, R. V. 2015. Incremental value creation and appropriation in a world with multiple stakeholders. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 137–147. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
|
|
Ghoshal, S. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4: 75–91. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
|
|
Guerrera, F. 2009. Welch condemns share price focus. Financial Times, March 12. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/294ff1f2-0f27-11de-ba10-0000779fd2ac Google Scholar
|
|
Haleblian, J., Devers, C. E., McNamara, G., Carpenter, M. A., Davison, R. B. 2009. Taking stock of what we know about mergers and acquisitions: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 35: 469–502. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
|
|
Halpern, P. 1983. Corporate acquisitions: A theory of special cases? A review of event studies applied to acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 38: 297–317. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
|
|
Harrison, J. S. 2011. Stakeholder theory in strategic management: A retrospective. In Phillips, R. A. (Ed.), Stakeholder theory: Impact and prospects: 99–110. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Harrison, J. S. 2019. Stakeholders. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199846740/obo-9780199846740-0096.xml Google Scholar
|
|
Harrison, J. S., Barney, J. B., Freeman, R. E., Phillips, R. E. (Eds.). 2019. Cambridge handbook of stakeholder theory: 3–18. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Harrison, J. S., Fiet, J. O. 1999. New CEOs pursue their own self-interests by sacrificing stakeholder value. Journal of Business Ethics, 19: 301–308. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Harrison, J. S., van der Laan Smith, J. 2015. Responsible accounting for stakeholders. Journal of Management Studies, 52: 935–960. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C. 2013. Stakeholder theory, value and firm performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23: 97–125. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
|
|
Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C. 2019. Harmful stakeholder strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04310-9 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
|
|
Heminway, J. M. 2017. Shareholder wealth maximization as a function of statutes, decisional law, and organic documents. Washington and Lee Law Review, 74: 939–972. Google Scholar
|
|
Henisz, W. J., Dorobantu, S., Nartey, L. J. 2014. Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 1727–1748. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
|
|
Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D. 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22: 125–139. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
|
|
Jacobsen, R. 1988. The persistence of abnormal returns. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 415–430. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Jensen, M., Meckling, W. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–360. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
|
|
Jensen, M. C. 2001. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14: 8–21. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Johnson, H. T., Kaplan, R. S. 1987. Relevance lost: The rise and fall of management accounting. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar
|
|
Kast, F. E., Rosenzweig, J. E. 1972. General systems theory. Academy of Management Journal, 15: 447–466. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
|
|
KPMG . 2013. The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2013. Retrieved from http://www.KPMG.com. Google Scholar
|
|
Lease, R. C., Masulis, R. W., Page, J. R. 1991. An investigation of market microstructure impacts on event study returns. Journal of Finance, 46: 1523–1536. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
|
|
Lieberman, M. B., Garcia-Castro, R., Balasubramanian, N. 2017. Measuring value creation and appropriation in firms: The VCA model. Strategic Management Journal, 38: 1193–1211. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Mattingly, J. E. 2017. Corporate social performance: A review of empirical research examining the corporation-society relationship using Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini social ratings data. Business & Society, 56: 796–839. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
|
|
McGregor, J. 2019. Group of top CEOs says maximizing profits no longer can be the primary goal of corporation. Washington Post, August 19. Retrieved from http://lobbying-group-powerful-ceos-is-rethinking-how-it-defines-corporations-purpose Google Scholar
|
|
Moore, T. 2019. Why Business Roundtable’s historic declaration wasn’t a fit for every company. PR Week, August 23. Retrieved from https://www.prweek.com/article/1594781/why-business-roundtables-historic-declaration-wasnt-fit-every-company Google Scholar
|
|
Odziemkowska, K., Henisz, W. J. 2016. Webs of influence: National stakeholder networks and corporate social performance. In Academy of Management Proceedings: 13867. Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Oler, D. K., Harrison, J. S., Allen, M. R. 2008. The danger of misinterpreting short-window event study findings in strategic management research: An empirical illustration using horizontal acquisitions. Strategic Organization, 6: 151–184. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
|
|
Pfeffer, J. 2007. A modest proposal: How we might change the process and product of managerial research. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1334–1345. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
|
|
Phillips, R. A., Barney, J. B., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S. 2019. Stakeholder theory. In Harrison, J. S., Barney, J. B., Freeman, R. E., Phillips, R. E. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of stakeholder theory: 3–18. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Phillips, R. S., Berman, S., Elms, H., Johnson-Cramer, M. 2010. Strategy, stakeholders and managerial discretion. Strategic Organization, 8: 176–183. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
|
|
Phillips, R. S., Berman, S. L., Elms, H., Johnson-Cramer, M. 2011. Stakeholder orientation, managerial discretion and nexus rents. In Phillips, R. (Ed.), Stakeholder theory: Impact and prospects. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Phillips, R. A., Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C. 2003. What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13: 479–502. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
|
|
Planck, M. 1950. Scientific autobiography and other papers. New York, NY: Philosophical Library. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., Sauter-Sachs, S. 2002. Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
|
|
Rönnegard, D., Smith, N. C. 2019. Shareholder primacy vs. stakeholder theory: The law as constraint and potential enabler. In Harrison, J. S., Barney, J. B., Freeman, R. E., Phillips, R. E. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of stakeholder theory: 117–131. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Rowley, T. J. 1997. Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22: 887–910. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
|
|
Sisodia, R., Wolfe, D. B., Sheth, J. 2007. Firms of endearment: How world-class companies profit from passion and purpose. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School. Google Scholar
|
|
Stout, L. A. 2012. The shareholder value myth: How putting shareholders first harms investors, corporations, and the public. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler. Google Scholar
|
|
Thomas, T. 2009. Business schools and management research: A UK perspective. Journal of Management Development, 28: 660–667. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Walsh, J. P. 2005. Book review essay: Taking stock of stakeholder management. Academy of Management Review, 30: 426–452. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
West, D. 2011. The purpose of the corporation in business and law school curricula. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Google Scholar
|
|
Wicks, A. C., Elmore, F. A., Jonas, D. 2019. Connecting stakeholder theory to the law and public policy. In Harrison, J. S., Barney, J. B., Freeman, R. E., Phillips, R. E. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of stakeholder theory: 97–116. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref
|
|
Williamson, O. E., Bercovitz, J. 1996. The modern corporation as an efficiency instrument: The comparative contracting perspective. In Kaysen, C. (Ed.), The American corporation today: 327–359. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
|
|
Zhu, H., Ma, X., Sauerwald, S., Peng, M. W. 2019. Home country institutions behind cross-border acquisition performance. Journal of Management, 45: 1315–1342. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
|
|
Zorn, M. L., Sexton, J. C., Bhussar, M. S., Lamont, B. T. 2019. Unfinished business: Nested acquisitions, managerial capacity, and firm performance. Journal of Management, 45: 1488–1516. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |